(2).jpg)
Greetings from Penang Restaurant
My dear friends and comrades in the audience and in cyberspace,
I just arrived from PENANG an hour ago -- no, not Penang where Permatang Pauh shines but a Malaysian restaurant in Philadelphia which has chains in major cities in the US. I had visited Temple University and had stopped by for "berbuka puasa" (breaking of the fast") and had thought of what to write for this occasion. I knew that I would get my tenth reminder from Teck Ghee as soon as I arrive home to New Jersey.
How global our world is, how pervasive the Internet has become-- how scary and wide-ranging the implications will continue to be.
Driving home I was composing this speech. Would it be about "creating think tanks that think?", " the need for a government that never sleeps"?, "a final appeal to abolish the ISA to save Raja Petra?", "the rise of the corporate-cybernetic-
I have finally chosen to annoy anyone in power that are allergic to "sensitive" issues by making some predictions of what the Internet can do, as a wonderful tool of creative anarchy and social transformation.
Why are governments afraid of the power of citizen journalism - and of the Internet in general? What will be the conclusion of this great war between government bloggers and Guevara-inspired guerilla-like grassroots-based cyber-freedom fighters? Especially the one that is raging in malaysiakini, malaysia-today, and other online portals. A war that is bringing criminals from the battlefields of cyberspace into the real world of the interrogation rooms of the Anti-Corruption Agency. Ones that help expose wrongdoings of elected representatives and bring their downfall. Battles that rage between ideas of totalitarianism in universities and prospects for a freedom of inquiry and anti-fascism in college classrooms. Spaces of knowledge that bring us up to date information on what magnitude of corruption the New Economic Policy has brought us after 40 years.
"Information wants to be free" as some Internet guru and philosopher of this cybernetic age might say. And as information leaves the author and transmits and transmutes itself, it assumes a life of its own. As the historian Ibnu Khaldun would say, to the effect "as the hands writes nothing is erased…" Or, as the physicist Stephen Hawkings would say, even data that transmutes is a life-form in itself.
But why is the Malaysian government afraid of the power of the Frankenstein it has allowed to roam the streets of Cyberjaya. Why is Malaysia's "ministry of cybernetics" afraid of this creature the magnitude of the mythical "Badang" (the strong man of the age of pre-agriculture Malaya) that becomes like "Agent Smiths" of the movie The Matrix roaming the streets exposing brutishly the corrupt practices of men and women, screaming of these people to be brought to justice?
Who can stop our Agents Smiths – even if counter-agents called Malaysian cyber-troopers as those cybernetic soldiers of fortune are cloned and droned and then released into blogs to engage in battles of the cyberfrontier – in this Mahabaratha of Malaysian cyber-rama as the general elections approaches?
There are several explanations I am proposing below- on how the Internet is going to further transform nations, such as Malaysia:
The power of cybernetics
1. In a globalised post-industrialist world, the development of a cybernating nation will continue to follow, to a degree or another the Centre-Periphery perspective of development.
2 .Pure historical materialist conception of change cannot fully explain why nations cybernate; the more a nation gets "wired" the more complex the interplay between nationalism and internationalism will be.
3. The more a nation transforms itself cybernetically, the more extensive the enculturalisation of the word "cybernetics" will be.
4. The extent of the enculturalization of the concept of "cybernetics" will determine the speed by which a nation will be fully integrated into the global production-house of telematics.
5. The stronger the authority of the regime the greater the control and magnitude of the cybernating process. In a cybernating nation, authority can reside in the political will of a single individual or a strong political entity.
6. The advent of the Internet in a developing nation signifies the genesis of the erosion of the power of government-controlled print media. Universal access to the Internet will determine the total erosion of government-produced print media.
7. Creative consciousness of the peoples of the cybernating nation will be centralised in the area of business and the arts, modeled after successful global corporations.
8. Critical consciousness of the people of the cybernating nation will be centralised in the area of political mobilisation and personal freedom of expression, modeled after successful Internet-based political mobilisation groups.
9. At the macro-level of the development of a nation-state, the contestation of power is between the nations cybernating versus the nations fully cybernated, whereas at the micro level, power is contested between the contending political parties/groups.
10. The more the government suppresses voices of political dissent, the more the Internet is used to affect political transformations.
11. The fundamental character of a nation will be significantly altered with the institutionalisation of the Internet as a tool of cybernating change. The source of change will however be ideologically governed by external influences, which will ultimately threaten the sovereignty of the nation-state.
12. Discourse of change, as evident in the phenomena of cybernation, is embedded in language. The more a foreign concept is introduced, adopted, assimilated, and enculturalised, the more the nation will loose its indigenous character built via schooling and other means of citizenship enculturalisation process.
13. Postmodernist perspectives of social change, rather than those of Structural-Functionalists, Marxist, or neo-Marxist, can best explain the structure and consequences of cybernetic changes.
These 13 propositions above I generated almost 10 years ago in my doctoral dissertaion seminar at Columbia University, New York city. These are general ideas of what is happening in the world of cyberspace as it clashes with the worldview of the physical space of the illusive concept of the "nation-state."
Conclusion
Today, I found myself not merely as a non-participant observer and analyst of the changes happening in Malaysia, but an agent of change itself participating in this exciting transformation our nation is constructing, with the blessings of the rakyat.
I found myself not only calling for changes through the more than 250 articles I have written on Malaysia, since 4 years ago, but also dragged into centers of controversy as a consequence of what I have written.
But most importantly, through an agent of "cybernetic change" itself I am grateful to have worked closely with so many wonderful "online colleagues and comrades" I have never met but looking forward to extend my "brothership-in arms" as we continue to push for changes. Among those dear to me are Dr. Lim Teck Ghee, Dr. Syed Husin Ali, Sdr. Purushothanam, and Sdr. Jeff Ooi and those who have given their commitment to the creation and ultimately the launching of this website -- people like Sdr. Desiderata (YenLong), Sdr. Bern Chua, Sdri. Hui Mei, Sdr. Wan Fadzrul, Sdr. Sonny, and many others. Thank you so much for the friendship and your commitment to peace, social justice, and multiculturalism. I look forward to meeting many of you in person some day, if not in Penang Restaurant in Philadelphia or New York City, but in Penang, in the state of Permatang Pauh!
Have a wonderful launch party and never ask for whom the bells tolls, for it toll for thee. Onward to the march of the cybernetic revolution, we do not have anything to lose except our Malaysian ISP providers.
Most importantly, visit our website often and contribute to our good cause. http://english.cpiasia.net/
Thank you for reading this speech, Teck Ghee.
8 comments:
Salam Dr,
I ahve been reading your articles. I try to read them all word by word by but I have to admit the level sophistication and intellectualism is too much for me on a daily basis. : ). So sometime i just skim throught to get the gist of it.
I like to be as intellectual as possible when discussing matters around religion and race and politics in Malaysia. Its much more exciting and satifying thn resorting to baseless emotional rhetoric to justify certain things in Malaysia.
I feel called upon after reading your last article on MRSM. this suggestion for giving away 30% is forgivable since you are an ex-MRSM and a malay. I truely and strongly support it based on the intention tht it is to help the Malays begin a new journey with lessen dependancy on the "tongkat" and introduce competition as in the globalised world.Should it be suggested by a non-Malay it would be a political drama tht might see UMNO-BN up in-arms about it.SO to begin with I will like to state I am with you and agree tht DEB has lost its real agenda and has been manipulated by a few in the name of the "poorer" natives of the land.
My Question is what about other communities and their willingness to sacrifice for a good cause in the spirit of national unity? It seems too much focus on the Malay agenda and their leaders to change.But not a single non-Malay leaders ahs called upon vernacular schools to be merged or as such. What is your opinion on this? U will find young Malays willing to take risk for Malaysia to be great by opening up competition and tht they are master of their own destinies and can live without DEB. But will the chauvinist from the other races willing to dis mantle or merge their schools and race-based business association-dominance? Perhaps I am slightly emoitional here because I fear tht as the Malay decide to leave their past and move forward, there will be those who will take advanteg of this and refuse to sacrifice anything as they will profit the most."The Social Contract" was written tht the NAtives will have special rights and the others can keep their identity and culture".Perhaps change requries to revamp the whole "Social Contract" which has only contributed to polarisation.Perhaps NAtional unity- equality is only good when it benefits certain parties but not the rest? Look forward to hear from you.Tq
bravo bravo, pengkianat bangsa, petualang negara,
Those who champion for justice for all races and peace through equality and empathy in education cannot be called a 'traitor' to his/her own race or 'enemy of the people'. in fact he/she should be taken seriously and his/her ideas put to practice. A patriot of one who has dissenting views and help move ideas to the frontier of human thinking.
My experience in the MRSM and MARA system and as an educator for radical change has taught me that the Malays can further progress by being brave enough to integrate with other races.
Ignorance is the greatest enemy of knowledge, and wisdom.
Why don't you reply the comment of ahmadcooper? It will surely be very interesting to read.
The Malays are being pressed too much beyond durability..
Yet I see no concessions from the non-malays and they are increasingly racist in private sectors.
I work in an International company where an Indian MD recently took over, and has ever since started a mad rampage against Malays in the company, firing them for no reasons, firing people who have been in the company for more than 5 to 7 years.
First he cleared all the top places replacing them of Indians only! The company is already drenched in law suits because of such unlawful terminations.
Now even the clerks and other managers are being harassed.
What do you have to say about these people amongst non-malays.
Looking at all these my blood boils, you would understand when you are in the same shoes.
On the other hand they will go and talk about Bangsa Malaysia!
doc, talk is cheap. everybody knows that and i believe you know that too.
let me give you this suggestion, why don't you and your so called intellectuals in CPI take a serious initiative for change in the Pakatan Rakyat level first.
Prove to the people that PR truly believes in what they preach ie non-racial, equality that they can really work together as one.
Why can't PR merge as one organization with common solid agendas for change if they truly believe in what they preach?
The first step would be to prove to the people that they really believe in what the say.
At the rate they are going,in 5 yrs time this will happen - PKR is going to be Malay Party, DAP for Chinese, PSM for Indians and PAS for the zealots.
There would be not that much different with the present BN model.
As of right now PR as a whole has only one sole agenda - to bring down the BN. No more no less,that's all to it.
Can you not imagine how chaotic it would be if these PR goons get hold to the power.
Doc, it is okay for one to be an idealist but at least be a realistic idealist.
And i can see that mr. Ahmadcooper has a very good solid question for you. Please don't ignore him. Let's show us how good CPI think tank is.
Truly hope you would not disappoint us and would furnish us your ideas about his inquiry.
salaam dr. Azly.
Dear naruto and all,
Thanks for your honest comment on CPI.
Education, though slow, tedious, and a long haul, is the most peaceful and surest way towards social and intellectual progress. political will helps as well.
CPI has only started; to engage others in dialogue on the issues that plague us as multicultural nation and to provide primary sources for research into nation building.
CPI is non-partisan but promotes radical change through the pursuit of inquiry into frontieering ideas.
Talk is indeed cheap is one do not take ideas and move nation.
Whatever political party that is going to take over the government will need to make radical changes to all the ministries. these changes involve not only policies but paradigms and guiding philosophies.
How we have been doing things for the last 50 years seems no longer working. but the change itself will involve pain.
To rely to Ahmad Cooper, I have only four words to start the discussion:
Begin with Year Zero
Salam Dr, Appreciate ur response. Like yourself i feel very excited about the prospects of a new Govt by PR. One thing for sure they will be more motivated and open to make positive change to benefit the nation.I enjoyed reading your latest article as well.
Coming back to the questions about " Melayu" in Malaysia.I agree that we have to start year zero. and i agree there will be some pain. I some what understand tht u believe like I do bangsa Melayu have no excuse and should stop being insecure and propel themselves towards greatness in the globalised world. I agree tht the stratgy used for the last 50 years have stopped working and infact its damaging the Malays and Malaysia.I agree if the Malays are brave or thought to be brave they can excel just like others.I married a Chinese. My best friends are from Malay, Chinese and Indians.Most of us are tired of racial politics but I am proud to be a Muslim Malaysian Malay so Question is how do we "neo-bumiputras" tackle and face the chauvinistic demands from some our non-bumi fellow citizens when we start year zero? in other words how do we undo the damage done and rebuild this nation without losing our identity and resist sense of fear and insecurity caused by 50 years of divide and rule?What do u suggest the non-bumi do to complement this rebuilding process?
It cant be only us tht needs reform kan?Look forward to your response.Tq
Post a Comment